Skip to content

Swiss general terms and conditions template (B2B services)

General terms and conditions for a Swiss provider selling services to business customers, ready to adapt to your offer. Download the Word file and read what each clause does, because terms only protect you if they actually make it into the contract.

Free · DOCX · 5 KB · Updated 19 August 2026

When to use this template

Use it when you sell broadly the same services to many business customers and want one document to do the work that a negotiated contract does for a one-off deal: what you deliver, when you get paid, and who bears which risk when something goes wrong. The template assumes a Swiss provider of services, an agency, a software house, a consultancy, a maintenance firm.

It is written for B2B only. Terms aimed at consumers face a stricter fairness control, and several clauses here would need rewriting. And for your largest deals, expect the customer to send its own paper anyway; general terms are the baseline, not the ceiling.

Terms bind only if they make it into the contract

General terms are not law you enact; they are contract text like any other, and a contract requires the parties' consent (Art. 1 CO). Your terms therefore bind a customer only if they were available and referred to before or at conclusion. A link on the invoice, after the deal is done, changes nothing.

Consent to terms nobody reads is real but thin, and the courts treat it that way. Under the unusualness rule of BGE 135 III 1, a clause the customer could not reasonably expect in this kind of document does not bind unless it was specifically pointed out. Otherwise, accepted terms are interpreted like any contract, as BGE 148 III 57 confirms, with ambiguity read against the drafter. The unfair-terms rule of Art. 8 UCA adds a content check aimed at consumer contracts; between businesses, the unusualness rule is the control that actually bites.

The other classic failure is the battle of forms: your offer refers to your terms, the purchase order refers to the customer's, and neither set cleanly wins. Clause 1 gives you a defence, but the reliable fix is process: an order confirmation that names your terms, every time.

The clauses, one by one

Scope and incorporation

Clause 1 states who the terms apply to, that they apply exclusively, and that conflicting customer terms need your express written acceptance. It keeps consumers out of scope. The drafting note reminds you of the part no clause can do for you: referring to the terms before the contract is concluded.

Offers and conclusion of contract

Offers are non-binding unless designated otherwise, and the contract arises with your confirmation or the start of performance. The individually agreed offer or confirmation prevails over the terms, which is both fair and what a court would decide anyway.

Services and cooperation

You promise careful, professional performance against the agreed specification; the customer promises the input you depend on. The second half matters more than it looks: missing cooperation extends your deadlines and lets you charge the extra effort, which defuses the most common source of project friction.

Prices, invoicing and payment

Prices exclusive of VAT, a defined payment period, and a right to suspend work after a reminder and grace period if invoices stay unpaid. Suspension is usually a more useful lever than default interest.

Delay and warranty

Dates are estimates unless agreed as binding; a missed binding date leads to a grace period, then withdrawal from the affected order. Warranty follows the same discipline: prompt inspection, written notice of defects within a defined period, and rectification or re-performance as the primary remedy before any fee reduction.

Liability

The most valuable clause in the document, and the easiest to draft invalid. It caps total liability at recent fees with a fixed ceiling and excludes indirect damage. What keeps it alive is the carve-out: liability for unlawful intent and gross negligence cannot be excluded in advance under Art. 100 CO. A cap without that reservation risks falling entirely. For work done by subcontractors, Art. 101 CO makes you answer for your auxiliaries; the template accepts that rather than testing the limits.

Intellectual property, confidentiality and data protection

Pre-existing rights stay where they are; the customer takes rights in the work results on full payment, while you keep your know-how, methods and tools. Both sides keep each other's non-public information confidential, and data protection is handled at framework level, with a pointer to a separate processing agreement where you process data on the customer's behalf.

Term, termination and changes to the terms

Recurring services renew in defined periods with a notice deadline; termination for good cause survives. Changes to the terms operate prospectively and give the customer an exit, because imposing new terms on running contracts with immediate effect is exactly the kind of surprise the unusualness rule punishes.

Final provisions

Written form for amendments, severability, Swiss law and an exclusive forum at your seat. Boilerplate, until the day the forum clause decides where you litigate.

Adapting it to your situation?

A template covers the standard case. A lawyer covers yours: fixed scope, fixed price, and a document you can actually sign.

This template and the guidance around it are general information, not legal advice. Whether they fit your situation depends on the facts, if in doubt, ask.

Questions

Frequently asked questions

Are general terms and conditions binding under Swiss law?

Yes, if they were made part of the contract: the customer must have had the chance to see them, and the offer or order confirmation must refer to them before or at conclusion. Terms sent afterwards, for example on the invoice, do not bind. Even validly incorporated terms have a limit: a clause the customer could not reasonably expect in that kind of document is not binding unless it was specifically pointed out.

What happens if my customer has their own terms?

Then neither set automatically wins. If both sides refer to their own conflicting terms and perform anyway, Swiss practice tends to knock the conflicting clauses out and fill the gap with statutory law, which is rarely what either side wanted. A defence clause helps, but the reliable fix is process: confirm every order in a document that names your terms, and settle the conflict expressly in negotiated deals.

Can I exclude liability completely in my terms?

No. Swiss law does not allow you to exclude liability for unlawful intent or gross negligence in advance, and an exclusion that ignores this limit risks being invalid as a whole. The workable approach is the one in the template: a cap tied to the fees for the affected services, an exclusion of indirect damage, and an express carve-out for the cases the law does not let you exclude. Where the cap lands is a business decision that should reflect your fees and your insurance.

Can I change my terms and conditions later?

For future contracts, yes, at any time: new orders are simply concluded under the new version. For running contracts it is harder, because a contract cannot be rewritten unilaterally. The defensible route is the one the template takes: notify changes, apply them from the next contract period, and give the customer the right to terminate if it does not accept them. Imposing surprising new terms on an existing contract with immediate effect is unlikely to hold up.

Don't sign the standard case.

Tell us what the document is for. You get a version drafted for your situation, reviewed by a lawyer, at a fixed price.