Skip to content

Structured execution.
Lawyer-led responsibility.

Every engagement combines legal technology, standardized workflows, matter-specific configuration, quality controls, professional judgment — and a named lawyer who is accountable for the result.

Commercial agreement review

In lawyer review

Workflow

  1. Intake and scope
  2. Document review
  3. Analysis and drafting
  4. Lawyer review
  5. Delivery

Findings for review

12 of 12 traced to source

  • Liability cap below preferred position

    Clause 12.3

  • Termination for convenience missing

    Clause 14

  • 24-month auto-renewal with 6-month notice

    Clause 2.1

  • Indemnity broader than market standard

    Clause 15.2

8 redlines proposed — awaiting approval

MRM. Rappo

A matter workspace: five workflow stages beside a list of contract findings, each traced to its source clause and awaiting lawyer approval.

A matter in progress: every finding traced to its source, every deliverable approved by the responsible lawyer.

The systems

  • Read every document
  • Trace findings to sources
  • Prepare first drafts

The lawyers

  • Set the strategy
  • Challenge the analysis
  • Answer for the result
  1. Client + lawyer

    Matter intake

    You describe the situation; a lawyer helps define or refine the scope where necessary. The client provides:

    • Business background
    • Relevant documents
    • Desired outcome
    • Legal jurisdiction
    • Deadlines
    • Commercial priorities
    • Risk tolerance
    • Preferred deliverable format
  2. Lawyer

    Scope definition

    Before any work starts, the responsible lawyer defines — in writing:

    • The legal questions
    • Relevant jurisdictions
    • Expected deliverables
    • Assumptions and exclusions
    • Required expertise
    • Review level
    • Timeline
    • Engagement model
  3. AI system

    Matter structuring

    The system turns an unstructured matter into a structured one. It organizes:

    • Documents and parties
    • Dates and obligations
    • Claims and legal issues
    • Relevant jurisdictions
    • Missing information
    • Factual inconsistencies
    • Dependencies between issues
  4. AI system

    AI-powered legal work

    Depending on the engagement, the system may:

    • Review and classify documents
    • Extract contractual provisions and obligations
    • Compare document versions
    • Research legislation and case law
    • Build factual chronologies
    • Detect inconsistencies
    • Identify legal and commercial risks
    • Generate structured first drafts
    • Prepare alternative arguments
    • Suggest revisions and produce issue lists
    • Organize evidence
  5. Lawyer

    Lawyer supervision

    Nothing reaches you unreviewed. Lawyers examine and challenge:

    • Legal sources
    • Factual assumptions
    • Reasoning
    • Material risks
    • Strategic implications
    • Commercial context
    • Drafting quality
    • Uncertainty and open questions
    • Alignment with your objectives

    Lawyers remain responsible for the professional service delivered to the client.

  6. Lawyer + AI system

    Quality control

    A repeatable quality process runs before anything is approved:

    • Source verification
    • Factual consistency checks
    • Citation checks
    • Issue checklists
    • Assumption review
    • Risk classification
    • Legal-reasoning review
    • Second-lawyer review where appropriate
    • Final deliverable approval
    • Clear separation of facts, assumptions, analysis and recommendations
  7. Lawyer

    Delivery and iteration

    You receive deliverables built for decisions, not just documentation:

    • Legal memoranda and contract drafts
    • Redlines and risk reports
    • Investigation reports
    • Decision and evidence matrices
    • Executive summaries and board briefings
    • Recommended next steps
    • Implementation checklists

    Feedback and revisions are managed within the defined engagement scope — changes to scope are agreed explicitly, not discovered on the invoice.

Engagement models

Structured to fit the matter.

Scope, deliverables and pricing are defined per engagement, before work begins. Typical structures:

  • Fixed-scope project

    A defined matter with defined deliverables — reviewed, priced and scheduled up front.

  • Ongoing legal support

    Continuous access to the firm for recurring business-law questions and documents.

  • High-volume legal review

    Structured review of large document sets — contracts, records, correspondence.

  • Recurring compliance work

    Scheduled reviews, policy updates and monitoring within an agreed framework.

  • Transaction support

    Diligence, documentation and issue management through signing and closing.

  • Complex strategic engagement

    Lawyer-led work on restructurings, investigations and high-stakes decisions.

  • Litigation support

    Case assessment, evidence organization and submissions alongside proceedings.

  • Investigation support

    Document review, chronology and reporting under lawyer-led investigation strategy.

Next step

See the process on your matter.

Describe the situation and we will walk you through the workflow, the deliverables and the engagement structure that fits.