Skip to content

Restructuring and insolvency

Creditor negotiations: preparation beats leverage

Why preparation matters more than leverage in creditor negotiations: know your contracts, the ranking of claims and your record before the first call.

Ismael Seck · 3 April 2026 · 6 min read

When cash gets tight, the instinct is to think about leverage: what can we threaten, what can we withhold, who blinks first. In practice, distressed companies rarely have much leverage, and the ones that negotiate successfully with their creditors are not the ones with the strongest position, but the ones with the best preparation. Preparation is the one advantage a debtor can build unilaterally, before the first call is made.

Know what your contracts actually say

Before speaking to any creditor, know your legal position with that creditor, not roughly, but precisely. Which events of default have occurred or are about to? Are there cross-default clauses that let one creditor's action trigger everyone else's rights? Who holds security, over what, and is it validly created? What termination rights, information rights and acceleration rights exist, and which have already been waived or lost through past conduct?

Boards are routinely surprised by their own contracts. A loan agreement signed in better times contains covenants nobody has looked at since. A supply contract everyone considers untouchable turns out to be terminable on short notice. You cannot negotiate around rights you do not know exist, and the creditor's lawyers will know them.

Know who ranks where

Creditors do not behave according to the size of their claims. They behave according to their ranking. A fully secured lender can afford patience; an unsecured trade creditor watching its exposure grow cannot. Art. 219 DEBA is where that order is set out: employee claims enjoy statutory privileges, while a shareholder loan, particularly a subordinated one under Art. 725b CO, effectively ranks at the very back.

Map your creditors accordingly: secured, privileged, unsecured, subordinated, and, cutting across that, strategic or replaceable. This map explains behaviour you would otherwise find irrational, and it tells you what each creditor's real alternative to a deal looks like. A creditor who would recover little in a bankruptcy has every reason to support a credible plan. Making that arithmetic visible (carefully, and honestly) is often the most persuasive thing a debtor can do.

Build the record before the first call

Nothing destroys a negotiation faster than numbers that change. Before you approach anyone, assemble the documentary record: current financial statements, a short-term rolling liquidity plan, a clear statement of what caused the crisis, and the restructuring measures already taken or committed. If the numbers are not reliable yet, fix that first. Asking creditors for concessions on the basis of figures you have to correct three weeks later costs you the only currency you have, credibility.

The record also matters defensively. If the restructuring fails, everything the board said and showed to creditors will be re-read in a harsher light, and under Art. 754 CO that reading is what decides personal liability. A record that was accurate at the time it was given is protection; an optimistic one is exposure.

Two further constraints shape what you can offer. The duties under Art. 725 CO run in parallel with the negotiation and do not pause for it. And a deal that quietly prefers one creditor over the others can be unwound later as a preference (Art. 288 DEBA), which is a good reason to keep the treatment of comparable creditors comparable.

A credible plan, and one version of the truth

Creditors do not grant concessions to companies; they grant them to plans. The plan does not need to be elaborate, but it must answer three questions convincingly: why the crisis happened, why it will not simply continue, and what exactly you are asking each creditor to do. A request for a standstill "while we work things out" is not a plan. A request for a defined contribution toward a defined outcome is. If unanimity is out of reach, say so early and name the alternative, because a composition under a moratorium (Art. 293 DEBA) can bind a dissenting minority in a way that an out-of-court agreement never can.

Then hold to one version of the truth. Creditors talk to each other: banks, credit insurers and large suppliers more than most debtors imagine. If one creditor learns that another was told a different story or quietly offered better treatment, the negotiation is usually over, and so is the trust needed for any future one. Consistent information, given to all key creditors on the same basis, is not just good ethics; it is negotiation strategy.

Sequence deliberately, document everything

Decide whom to approach first (usually the creditor whose cooperation makes the others possible) and what you need from each before moving to the next. Confirm every understanding in writing while it is fresh; a concession that lives only in a phone call has a way of shrinking later. And keep your own notes of every conversation.

None of this requires leverage. It requires work done early, before the pressure peaks and the options narrow. How a specific negotiation should be structured depends on the facts: the creditor landscape, the security positions, the cash runway. If you are heading into conversations like these, we are happy to help you prepare them.

This is general information, not legal advice. How it applies to your situation depends on the facts, if in doubt, ask.

We're here to help.

Get a first orientation from our AI, or talk directly to a lawyer about your situation: whichever helps you move forward.